I do not believe the Obama Democratics want to take every ones guns. They do believe they think they should be able to do decide which ones you own. Same thing with hunting or any thing else.
I don't want to hijack this thread into gun control. I don't think the Ds want to "take" away your guns. I don't think they would survive a challenge to the SC. But I do think reasonable minds can differ on where you draw the lines on what the 2nd amendment protects. Justice Scalia has opined that the line should be drawn at what you can bear individually. In other words, tanks, artilllary, etc. would not be covered. He also opined that just because you might be able to carry a SAM or a grenade launcher doesn't mean they are protected. So I think it is just an issue of where to draw the line.
As to hunting, well, for many decades most fish and game have been considered public property. Owned by all of us, not the individual whose property it happens to be on. I have no real problem with that. I think they try to manage and balance the competing interests. Either at the federal or the state level (most of the regs that impact us are state regs). I don't always agree with them, but I don't know that I could balance things any better.
