Barrs

The way I understand it, and from all I've read, it seems those who have been vocal opponents of the no-Barr rule are opposed simply due to the fact should they randomly catch a Barr hog it should be counted. I believe the purpose of the rule is strictly to keep teams from stacking the odds and to promote a more even playing field.

With that being said, perhaps here's a solution.

Allow Barr hogs, and treat them just as any other hog in the stringer....basically one or all.

However, in the polygraph test ask the following question:

"Did you, your teammates, or anyone else knowingly release or relocate feral hogs in preparation for your teams participation in this competition?"

I think that would cut out all the BS of what the "no-Barr" rule is trying to accomplish, but still allow those randomly caught Barr hogs to count.

Thoughts?