Are we talking about the original "working" bulldog? Or the "pit" bulldog? I was speaking of the "pit" bulldog. And that breed is a animal aggressive dog as most of us know, so they may do just fine passing dogs and catching hogs for a certain period of time but you can't act too surprised if they catch a dog eventually. IMO it's wonderful that there's a way to work the breed I love without risking legal troubles but I think some need to keep in mind what the dog was originally bred for. Some people are EXPECTING these dogs to NOT do what they were orginally bred to do. I understand it's the idea to recognize the difference between a dog and a hog but that's not what they were bred to do. I want to be clear, I don't condone a dog catching another dog but I'm very aware that it's the dogs instinct to catch whatever animal is in front of them so I wouldn't be surprised if it happened, no matter how many times the dog has passed dogs to catch a hog. I'm also not speaking about the everyday pitbull either, I'm speaking of a real deal bulldog.
It's easy to take folks typing the wrong way since you can't hear the tone in voice or facial expressions and because of that I want it to be very clear I understand what everybody is saying, I'm not arguing, just stating how I feel about the situation.
That's the issue with using incorrect terms. Pit bulls are terriers, developed for a specific purpose and then dual tasked as CDs. Their 1st and foremost job was the box now people want to complain about DA and rant about it...? Explain to me how this makes sense.
