Being a tight bred chinaman dog is a lot different than being the tightest bred chinaman dog on the planet. That's what you said. That is untrue. He was a frisco dog and that is a fact. Triple bred... Frisco was not chinaman... No where close. Thanks
Frisco was a SON of Chinaman, how does that make him "nowhere close"? Frisco is a hybrid cross of the CHINAMAN and Bolio "strains" of dogs.... being based on a cross means the dogs DONT ALWAYS COME OUT A PERFECT BLEND OF THE TWO PARENT STRAINS... meaning Frisco could produce dogs that would be perfect blends of the two strains, or produce dogs that favor one side or the other.... Since you know so much about Meat... you would have know that he favored the Chinaman side of his family tree... seeing as he was GRANDSON of Chinaman... but you know... "Not even close"... right? In regards to his personality, his physical attributes, and his producing capability... Meat was described as a red version of Chinaman.... Tom did a handful of triple bred Frisco breedings. So were there others like him? Of course! I didn't say "The SINGLE/LONE/ONE AND ONLY tightest bred chinaman dog on the planet"... In fact! That statement is a quote directly from Tom Garners mouth... To my husband's ear!
Look man, I'm one of the most polite people on this board, but I don't take it lightly when people hijack a thread and try to tell me how a dog you have never seen, nor touched, is bred. I can read a darn pedigree. I've had/have some good bulldogs in my time. You aren't teaching me anything. I don't even have a clue as to who you are. Clearly you decipher a pedigree differently. It is what it is. If you have any further concerns as to how a dog in this pedigree is bred, you can PM me, rather than filling Mr. Bob's thread with any further BS as to how you personally decipher a ped.
