I think my dogs are pretty successful, I think Bolens dogs are different from mine, but I believe they are quite successful, I think a lot of dogs that are completely different from mine are very successful, what I can't understand, is what is it about Australia that makes some Americans lose their damn minds and think there is no possible other way near as good as the way some foreigners showed them? Why can't "one out" guys ever admit that their "finder holders" are great for the environment they are used in, but it is also possible that there are other dogs, better for the environments they were created for?
I think my curs are better hog dogs than your finder holders, but that is only my opinion, it may or may not be accurate so what is the point of getting 4 pages worth of bent out of shape trying to prove the theoretical superiority of one or the other? I garauntee that if we sight casted your dogs and mine to a sounder of hogs in an open field yours would be caught on a hog before mine got there, but what I can also say with some degree of certainty is at least a few of mine would leave your dog with the hog caught and go rally the sounder we just cut loose on so we could continue to catch the rest. Of course, they may leave the property line, so I guess that means mine must be inferior dogs... Lol
There not only running them types of dogs in au n it can also be said that Americans lose there mind when we say au dogs can work here also I there are guys in au that run bay dogs a guy I met actually runs Mr masons cats n breed them down there and they work there so if American bay dogs can work there why can au finder holders work here but I will say I had cat in my line n also shepherd so my dogs had speed n a dam good nose my uncle still has full shepherds he runs as finder holders
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk
