|
t-dog
|
 |
« on: December 03, 2019, 12:25:35 pm » |
|
Rafterbark I want to hear his thoughts on that too. I personally don't think that in that situation the person can say they have a "Bloodline". They have dogs that aren't line bred. If they start lone breeding those dogs then yes in a couple generations they could say it. But if they keep breeding those dogs but not line breeding, then all they have are scatter bred dogs. It doesn't matter if they were even registered dogs. If they aren't related then they are still scatter bred. "Bloodline" suggests gene potency. It means dogs that come with uniformity and consistency in a multitude of areas because the genes were isolated or intentional selected. That is EXTREMELY hard to do when you breed unrelated dogs. If they get 2 dogs that are related, line bred and raise a litter then again, they have dogs. It's a bloodline but it is a bloodline that they have but not their bloodline. In a couple generations down the road it becomes theirs. The dogs likely start changing in a couple generations for several possible reasons unless the original breeder is having an influence in it. JMO! Most of the folks you are speaking of either don't know the difference because of lack of experience or they are glory hounds. I personally don't care if someone tells people that the dogs they got from me are their bloodline. Mainly because those types are gonna screw them up pretty quick and it's better if everyone thinks they were theirs and my mutts aren't reflected upon negatively. Again JMO
Sent from my SM-G892U using Tapatalk
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
