this is bull

[-s kennels]

When Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry goes for a jog in Texas, the governor doesn't just throw on a pair of gym shorts and tennis shoes before dashing out the door. He also packs a concealed .380 Ruger loaded with deadly hollow-point bullets, fully equipped with a laser-sight for precise killing. (What, you don't?)

He says he keeps it on him in case of an attack from wild animals. Last year, the Texas governor sent a coyote to canine heaven with a single shot while he was exercising in Austin, claiming it had threatened his dog.

But if he were elected president, could Perry hypothetically continue to pack heat on his morning run? You're damn right he could.

The Ticket asked several constitutional scholars and presidential experts if a sitting president would be allowed to carry a gun if he wanted to, even if it meant breaking local law. Since the White House is located in Washington, D.C.--a city that bans carrying firearms--the answer isn't perfectly simple. As presidential scholar Kenneth R. Mayer of the University of Wisconsin put it, the legal questions would get "big, fat, and hairy in a hurry."

The short answer is that if the president really wanted to run around Lafayette Park with a revolver strapped to his leg, the legal barriers would be easily surmountable.

In 2008, the Supreme Court struck down a decades-old D.C, law that banned gun ownership in the District of Columbia, but it is still illegal to carry a gun around the city. That second part doesn't sit well with Perry, who considers owning a gun a "fundamental right" enshrined in the Second Amendment to the Constitution.

"We Texans like our guns," Perry writes in his book, Fed Up!. "We don't like meddlesome statists who want to infringe on our right to keep and bear them."

Like it or not, the president would be breaking local law by carrying his gun in the city, but there are several ways he could get around it if he wanted to.

First, the president could easily sign an executive order that makes it legal for him to carry a weapon. Executive Orders are considered as good as law, so there would be little that could stop him, said Adam Winkler, UCLA law professor and author of the new book Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America.

"No man is above the law, not even the president. If applicable law bars him from carrying a gun, then he must obey," Winkler told The Ticket. "Of course, the president is powerful. He could probably just sign an executive order authorizing himself to carry guns wherever he likes."

If, however, the president didn't want to pursue his right to carry through an executive order, he could also take the argument to the federal courts.

The president would have to  "persuade the court that carrying the gun was part of his official duties," said Eric M. Freedman, professor of constitutional law at Hofstra University. That wouldn't necessarily be easy, given that the president is already surrounded by a heavily armed team of Secret Service personnel, but then again, White House lawyers are notorious for legal arguments to justify presidential power. (Amiright John Yoo?)

The president could also request to be deputized in the District, which would allow him to carry a firearm via the same channels that members of law enforcement in the District use.

The gun-toting president could, of course, avoid all these sticky legal problems if he kept his outdoor exercise regimen out of DC. There are plenty of trails, foothills and paths a short drive away in Virginia, a state with loose gun laws, where the president could run freely with the wind blowing through his holsters.

The Secret Service, however, could make a very serious argument that the president shouldn't be carrying a weapon for his own protection. Remember, a spirited debate broke out in the days leading up to President Obama's inauguration over whether he would be forced to surrender his Blackberry for security concerns. (In the end, Obama got to keep his Blackberry, but under certain conditions.) If a Blackberry's almost off limits, you can imagine how the Secret Service might react if the president wanted to pack a Glock. When contacted for this article, a spokesman for the Secret Service declined to speak on the record.

Of course, we won't really know how this would all come out until a president actually tries to pack heat on Washington's mean streets. Then again, we might not even get that far. When asked this week on the campaign trail if he was packing, Perry told Politico's Ben Smith, "I never comment on whether I'm carrying a handgun or not. That's why it's called concealed."

And really, who would ever check?

[waylon-N.E. OK]

an old saying applies here - Don't sweat the dumb chit  

[T-Bob Parker]

an old saying applies here - Don't sweat the dumb chit  

Hahahahahahahahahahdaha exactly what I was thinking.

[mod93dirt]

I have a gun on me at all times, so why shouldn't the President? The great state of Oklahoma sees it fit for me to carry a gun, so why should the Pres. of the US not be allowed to carry one. More power to the guy for standing up to his belief in the 2nd amendment. I highly doubt the current dumba$$ in office even knows how to properly load and fire a gun.

[SCHitemHard]

I have a gun on me at all times, so why shouldn't the President? The great state of Oklahoma sees it fit for me to carry a gun, so why should the Pres. of the US not be allowed to carry one. More power to the guy for standing up to his belief in the 2nd amendment. I highly doubt the current dumba$$ in office even knows how to properly load and fire a gun.

if it goes off in a press conference due to the crotch salute then the whole world will laugh alittle harder at the good ol U.S of A

JMO

[mod93dirt]

Thats just it SCHitem....any Pres who would carry a gun obviously has more respect for our country than to do the crotch salute.

[rdjustham]

deadly hollow point bullets and a laser sight for precision killing??  These two analogies should never be in someone's head.  Wouldnt it be a little better for shooting enthusiasts to read like this...  hollow points that wont penetrate thwough a target so as to not injure innocents, as well as a laser sight to ensure the safety of bystanders?

[sfboarbuster]

Ryan, you've got to remember this came from a reporter...

[Reuben]

deadly hollow point bullets and a laser sight for precision killing??  These two analogies should never be in someone's head.  Wouldnt it be a little better for shooting enthusiasts to read like this...  hollow points that wont penetrate thwough a target so as to not injure innocents, as well as a laser sight to ensure the safety of bystanders?

x2...sometimes it is not what we say but how we say it.

[rdjustham]

Ryan, you've got to remember this came from a reporter...

Oh ok.  I wasnt sure, but it sure sounded like the liberal media.  I was hoping the original poster wouldnt word it that way..

[wilton]

What other kind of media do we have in this God-forsaken country except the extreme liberal leftism, who combined with the glorification of hollywood idols; ie: golden idols as in the bible, and the rich/powerful lefty democrats whose money bought and paid for B.O. and will again unless the people of "We the people of these United States" rise up and put down this tyranny.

[Explorer]

As if the president of the United States or of any country for that matter goes jogging alone?? They have a bunch of boddy guards running along them and have the perimeter closed off to the general public. That's probably enough protection, I say no need for a gun.