|
got2catchem
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: December 28, 2009, 07:44:31 pm » |
|
I believe it's a combination of both. Land plays a part, but you still have to have dogs that are able to get it done.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Richard E.
|
|
|
|
Bryant
|
|
« Reply #21 on: December 28, 2009, 08:28:24 pm » |
|
I definately think hog density on the land is the biggest factor. The best dogs in the world can't bay hogs where there are none.
A major thing that will definately up your numbers is dogs that will roll off once the hog is legged. I would say more times than not when a hog is struck, it was not alone. Even the ten minutes it might take to get a hog tied and the dogs back out hunting can put a lot of space between you and the group that left out.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
A truly rich man is one whose children rush to fill his arms even though his hands are empty.
|
|
|
|
raider54
|
|
« Reply #22 on: December 28, 2009, 08:56:36 pm » |
|
I notice alot of these comments are comming from people who claim to catch alot of hogs, Soooo? are you saying your dogs suck but you have lots of hogs?
Whats wrong with the thought that thier might be some hunters out there that have good dogs? Dogs that go out and find a hog when you dont turn them out on top of one? Dogs that will roll out after catching a hog and find another one, after another, after another?
you know whats funny? according to this thread you dont really need a good dog to find bay and catch hogs! and this thread comes on the same day that I post a thread about catching 23 hogs this week! and being proud of our young pack. I didnt realize all these years how easy catching hogs really is.
all you have to do is turn any old dog out just anywhere because we all know there are so many hogs just anywhere you go!
this is not only funny its obsurd
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I TALK ALOT OF SMACK-COME GO WITH ME AND I'LL SHOW YOU IT ISNT ALL SMACK Facebook Check Out-Hog Hunting Texas Style See our web site www.XXXtremehogdoggin.com |
|
|
|
got2catchem
|
|
« Reply #23 on: December 28, 2009, 09:29:39 pm » |
|
raider54, Although some people are roasting you because they find it un-believable that there are dogs good and capable enough to find that many hogs in a week, I think the majority of the flack you are catching is because your earlier thread sort of came off as bragging. I know you probably didn't mean it that way, but I think alot of people took it like that. Also the fact that BadBoar30 said "i dare any of u to challenge their dogs" didn't help any..  .. Either way 25 hogs in a week is impressive. It sounds like yall have some good dogs and are really proud of them and their accomplishments. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Richard E.
|
|
|
|
PPHOGDOGGER
|
|
« Reply #24 on: December 28, 2009, 09:32:44 pm » |
|
raider54, Although some people are roasting you because they find it un-believable that there are dogs good and capable enough to find that many hogs in a week, I think the majority of the flack you are catching is because your earlier thread sort of came off as bragging. I know you probably didn't mean it that way, but I think alot of people took it like that. Also the fact that BadBoar30 said "i dare any of u to challenge their dogs" didn't help any.. .. Either way 25 hogs in a week is impressive. It sounds like yall have some good dogs and are really proud of them and their accomplishments. IT SHOULDNT MATTER HOW HE CAME OFF THAT DUDES A MODERATER. HE SHOULD CONDUCT HIMSELF IN A MORE PROFESSIONAL MANNER RAHTER THAN JUST TRYING TO START A THREAD JUST STIR THE POT. IT WAS OBVOIUSLY CALLING THIS GUYS NUMBERS AND DOGS INTO QUESTION. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
got2catchem
|
|
« Reply #25 on: December 28, 2009, 09:39:14 pm » |
|
I personally don't see where Chris was trying to stir the pot, but that’s just me. If you will go back and look, there have been numerous posts, where another thread has raised Chris's curiosity and sparked him to make a thread. I can't blame someone for wanting to do their homework. I'd be a little more careful before presuming someone's intentions. WHY DID YOU CHANGE YOUR POST?
OK, if it makes you feel any better. I believe I said something about you not doing your homework. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 28, 2009, 10:13:21 pm by got2catchem »
|
Logged
|
Richard E.
|
|
|
|
PPHOGDOGGER
|
|
« Reply #26 on: December 28, 2009, 09:49:02 pm » |
|
ITS NOT THAT SERIOUS THAT I NEED TO DO ANY TYPE OF HOME WORK DUDE. UNLIKE YOU I CAN LOOK AT IT FROM THE OUTSIDE LOOKING IN I CAN TELL WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. I KNOW NEITHER PARTIES. I HAVE SEEN OTHER POSTS WHERE THE MODS ARE QUESTIONING EVERYTHING. NEVER SEEN SO MANY HATERS!
SO APPARENTLY YOU HAVE LET YOUR CRUSH OVER THIS GUY GET IN THE WAY OF SEEING WHAT IS TRUE. IM DONE
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Circle C
|
|
« Reply #28 on: December 28, 2009, 09:53:37 pm » |
|
pphogdogger,
you need to chill before you go off and make accusations about my intentions with this thread.
I may be a moderator, but I am also open to learning and having a dialogue about something that peaks my interest. Rather than jack raiders thread, I started my own. For the record, I am quite impressed with the numbers that he and several others on ethd are able to produce. Additionally, I would like to add that I did not and do not question this guys numbers or his dogs. I have no reason to believe he is stating anything other than the truth.
now if you cannot accept that, I suggest you find some other forum to post on. If you would like to have any more dialogue regarding this issue, feel free to call me
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Never get too busy making a living that you forget to make a life.
|
|
|
|
got2catchem
|
|
« Reply #29 on: December 28, 2009, 10:01:25 pm » |
|
ITS NOT THAT SERIOUS THAT I NEED TO DO ANY TYPE OF HOME WORK DUDE. UNLIKE YOU I CAN LOOK AT IT FROM THE OUTSIDE LOOKING IN I CAN TELL WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. I KNOW NEITHER PARTIES. I HAVE SEEN OTHER POSTS WHERE THE MODS ARE QUESTIONING EVERYTHING. NEVER SEEN SO MANY HATERS!
SO APPARENTLY YOU HAVE LET YOUR CRUSH OVER THIS GUY GET IN THE WAY OF SEEING WHAT IS TRUE. IM DONE
LMAO..You seemed to be getting a little worked up for it not to be that serious. I've met Chris all of two times and have never met raider54, so I'm not quite sure that would be validating enough to put me on the inside. So basically what you said makes no sense. It seems to me by you mentioning " I HAVE SEEN OTHER POSTS WHERE THE MODS ARE QUESTIONING EVERYTHING" that you already hold personal feelings against the moderators, where obviously your feeling must have been hurt. That would sort of go against your whole "OUTSIDE LOOKING IN " innuendo. BTW..Your crush statement was just a lame attempt to get at me, because none of what you said makes any sense, Dude...lol |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Richard E.
|
|
|
|
craig
|
|
« Reply #30 on: December 28, 2009, 10:15:32 pm » |
|
ok ill play,
first off raider you have mis- interpeted this thread, you think this is aimed at you. when it is purely a question to the board, if you have hunted long enough you would know that you can have the best dogs in the world and if there arent any hogs around than you go home empty handed, so yes having a good hog population helps alot..
and pphogdogger i think you have some healing up to do over something else, to jump in like that..
you guys maynot know it but the guys that repleyed to this thread have more experience an as good of dogs as anybody.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
raider54
|
|
« Reply #31 on: December 28, 2009, 10:20:23 pm » |
|
pphogdogger,
you need to chill before you go off and make accusations about my intentions with this thread.
I may be a moderator, but I am also open to learning and having a dialogue about something that peaks my interest. Rather than jack raiders thread, I started my own. For the record, I am quite impressed with the numbers that he and several others on ethd are able to produce. Additionally, I would like to add that I did not and do not question this guys numbers or his dogs. I have no reason to believe he is stating anything other than the truth.
now if you cannot accept that, I suggest you find some other forum to post on. If you would like to have any more dialogue regarding this issue, feel free to call me
Chris my comment wasnt dirrected at you but there is someone on here that never misses an oppertunity to try and start some Crap with me but it will be catching up with him soon! I do appologize for the trouble. Our door is always open for anyone to come hunt with us! and BRAGGING? I have two sons in Combat right now, the last thing I need to bragg on is a dog! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I TALK ALOT OF SMACK-COME GO WITH ME AND I'LL SHOW YOU IT ISNT ALL SMACK Facebook Check Out-Hog Hunting Texas Style See our web site www.XXXtremehogdoggin.com |
|
|
|
PPHOGDOGGER
|
|
« Reply #32 on: December 28, 2009, 10:27:03 pm » |
|
guys, guys, guys Circle C may not have been saying anything but i seen what the raider said and was like that is pretty funny. Then I used what I have seen in the past and developed an opinion. CRIME  I guess if not the majorities. no phone calls are needed. i was under the impression that it was an open forum. ill leave my opinion at the door next time. to the other guy you know why i posted what i did. i stand by my word and will never make a statement and then retract it to make it sound in a totally different tone. about getting defensive i dont remember asking about your friendship resume' with circle c , so i dont know where that came up. if my post doesn't make perfect sense to you i dont know what to tell you. besides re-read it and if that dont work read it again. i thought at least i got across what i wanted, but you cant please everyone i guess |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
raider54
|
|
« Reply #33 on: December 28, 2009, 10:30:14 pm » |
|
Posts: 752 Re: Big numbers? « Reply #8 on: Today at 12:37:39 pm » Quote Modify -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I believe Ive already said that! I believe it is a combination of both! if you dont have any hogs you arent going to catch any ok ill play,
first off raider you have mis- interpeted this thread, you think this is aimed at you. when it is purely a question to the board, if you have hunted long enough you would know that you can have the best dogs in the world and if there arent any hogs around than you go home empty handed, so yes having a good hog population helps alot..
and pphogdogger i think you have some healing up to do over something else, to jump in like that..
you guys maynot know it but the guys that repleyed to this thread have more experience an as good of dogs as anybody.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I TALK ALOT OF SMACK-COME GO WITH ME AND I'LL SHOW YOU IT ISNT ALL SMACK Facebook Check Out-Hog Hunting Texas Style See our web site www.XXXtremehogdoggin.com |
|
|
|
Eric
|
|
« Reply #34 on: December 28, 2009, 10:31:31 pm » |
|
Its land, handlers and dogs. The people who catch lots of hogs have 1) the hog #s 2) a great plan of attack and can execute it 3) the dogs to back it up.
The most underated by most people is experience hunting, creating that plan of attack. People with alot of experience hunting are usually the most efficient at catching hogs and putting up big numbers. The idea that you put the dogs down and let them do all the work is not true, IMO, no matter how much we joke about it.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 28, 2009, 10:35:40 pm by Eric »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
raider54
|
|
« Reply #35 on: December 28, 2009, 10:36:52 pm » |
|
Well said Eric
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I TALK ALOT OF SMACK-COME GO WITH ME AND I'LL SHOW YOU IT ISNT ALL SMACK Facebook Check Out-Hog Hunting Texas Style See our web site www.XXXtremehogdoggin.com |
|
|
|
craig
|
|
« Reply #36 on: December 28, 2009, 10:45:30 pm » |
|
well im glad we cleared that up so we can move on.. X2 Mr. Eric |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
got2catchem
|
|
« Reply #37 on: December 28, 2009, 10:50:36 pm » |
|
i dont remember asking about your friendship resume' with circle c , so i dont know where that came up.
I guess you just have to explain it to some people... UNLIKE YOU I CAN LOOK AT IT FROM THE OUTSIDE LOOKING IN I CAN TELL WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. I KNOW NEITHER PARTIES.
From your quote you said "Unlike You"(you were referencing me) that you could look at it from the outside looking in because you didn't know either parties. So you must have assumed that I knew one of them. Which led me to null your statement and show that it made no sense with the so called "friendship resume". That should be broken down Barney style enough to solve your first question. Now with you also stating that you could “LOOK AT IT FROM THE OUTSIDE LOOKING IN”. That would suggest that you “KNOW NEITHER PARTIES” and tried to make it sound as though I was biased, but you then undermined yourself again by saying “I HAVE SEEN OTHER POSTS WHERE THE MODS ARE QUESTIONING EVERYTHING” which proves that you are the one that is actually biased. If you’d like I may be able to draw some stick figures to help you interpret this. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Richard E.
|
|
|
|
PPHOGDOGGER
|
|
« Reply #38 on: December 28, 2009, 11:02:48 pm » |
|
OK , JESUS DUDE. JUST STOP ITS EMBARRASSING . YOU WIN!!! I CANT BELIEVE YOU WOULD WASTE YOUR TIME TO BREAK DOWN EVERY WORD IN MY STATEMENT INTO TO A Q&A PARAGRAPH FORM. WOW!
PAT YOURSELF ON THE BACK I CANT COMPETE WITH THAT.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Mike
|
|
« Reply #39 on: December 28, 2009, 11:07:43 pm » |
|
I guess I missed all the fun... it's my turn to play now.  PPHOGDOGGER, evidently you have a big problem with my moderators and how this board is ran... i'll solve that problem for you.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
