OWL Black Mouth Curs
|
how about the outcome of a civilian shooting a threatening le canine?
they place their "canine employees" almost, if not equal to, a human officer.
but wait, it's okay for them to use canines as long as it's in their interest, while
our rights to raise, possess and use canines is steadily infringed upon?
civilians cannot even legally kill a dog unless it is in the act of
endangering domestic livestock, even then...
as a side note, i'm not against military and law enforcement using dogs. not in the least. it's just that the gap in between what is okay (moral, ethical, lawful) for government, military and law enforcment and what is okay for civilians gets wider and wider by the day. it seems to me that to be able to create and enforce standards, you, as the creator and enforcer, must also live by the standards you create and enforce. who will guard the guards?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
charles
|
as a side note, i'm not against military and law enforcement using dogs. not in the least. it's just that the gap in between what is okay (moral, ethical, lawful) for government, military and law enforcment and what is okay for civilians gets wider and wider by the day. it seems to me that to be able to create and enforce standards, you, as the creator and enforcer, must also live by the standards you create and enforce. who will guard the guards? [/quote] its a do as I say, not as I do government. they shouldn't be charged to uphold the law if they cant abide by the law. who will guard the guards? I used to be the rights of the civilians, but that power has been forgotten and removed, the law makers don't ask the citizens to vote on the laws, they just make them and ignore them theirselves.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Why should I trade one tyrant three thousand miles away for three thousand tyrants one mile away? An elected legislature can trample a man's rights as easily as a king can!
|
|
|
Reuben
|
how about the outcome of a civilian shooting a threatening le canine?
they place their "canine employees" almost, if not equal to, a human officer.
but wait, it's okay for them to use canines as long as it's in their interest, while
our rights to raise, possess and use canines is steadily infringed upon?
civilians cannot even legally kill a dog unless it is in the act of
endangering domestic livestock, even then...
as a side note, i'm not against military and law enforcement using dogs. not in the least. it's just that the gap in between what is okay (moral, ethical, lawful) for government, military and law enforcment and what is okay for civilians gets wider and wider by the day. it seems to me that to be able to create and enforce standards, you, as the creator and enforcer, must also live by the standards you create and enforce. who will guard the guards? I say AMEN to that...
|
|
|
Logged
|
Training dogs is not about quantity, it's more about timing, the right situations, and proper guidance...After that it's up to the dog... A hunting dog is born not made...
|
|
|
BigFool
|
Besides theses cops that are out of control are keeping food on your table so, your welcome.
At the same time we are the ones putting food on their tables, both cops and the thugs!!! I don't see how they keep food on my table???
|
|
|
Logged
|
God gave you two ears and one mouth meaning you should listen twice as much as you talk.
|
|
|
S_J_KENNELS
|
Besides theses cops that are out of control are keeping food on your table so, your welcome.
At the same time we are the ones putting food on their tables, both cops and the thugs!!! I don't see how they keep food on my table??? He was referencing criminal defense atty's.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Shane
|
|
|
Easttex91
|
Besides theses cops that are out of control are keeping food on your table so, your welcome.
At the same time we are the ones putting food on their tables, both cops and the thugs!!! I don't see how they keep food on my table??? X2
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SwampHunter
|
The cops should of use there baton first , or tazer , then the gun , supposed to use what force to get situation under control , with out goin staight go leathel force unless you have to fear for your life an with 4 or 5 cops there the dog is not going to kill you
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cantexduck
|
If the officer thought the dog was about to bite him then I stand behind his actions. I doubt someone is going to shoot a dog in public being filmed for the fun of it. Common sense should tell you that. Yes , I am sure the officers knew multiple cameras were on them.
|
|
|
Logged
|
There's a coon, nevermind, thats Buster.
"So I pawned my lacy off to my girlfriend. That should teach her to meet men off match.com" Rich.
|
|
|
GetTheBreakStick
|
im sure those of you.who are law enforcement officers are not.going.to.speak against the actions of fellow officers. and im sure those who live in rural areas who know every policeman by name and have never dealt with a angry police.officer who has.to.deal.with alot of drama and legit criminals daily cant truely understand how (semi understandably)rude and short tempered inner city cops can.be.. Ive dealt with these cops spending ALOT of time on the southside of chicago. and while alot of ppl say what they will do.for.their dogs.. ive sat in jail.over mine and the right to own them.. With that being said if I was walking.my dog.. and seen police officers at work.. doing inportant work.. video taping would not be on my mind. I cant.watch thee entire video.but I.believe the dog.is a rottie.. A dog who.I know will protect and defend.to.the death.. if he would have jus looked.over the situation before hand.. this could and should have been.prevented..
|
|
|
Logged
|
Live and Love Hunt and Laugh
|
|
|
|